You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Challenges in Veterinary Vaccine Development and Immunization.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Vaccine Design
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3389-1_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3388-4, 978-1-4939-3389-1
|
| Authors |
Mark A. Chambers, Simon P. Graham, Roberto M. La Ragione, Chambers, Mark A., Graham, Simon P., La Ragione, Roberto M. |
| Editors |
Sunil Thomas |
| Abstract |
In approaching the development of a veterinary vaccine, researchers must choose from a bewildering array of options that can be combined to enhance benefit. The choice and combination of options is not just driven by efficacy, but also consideration of the cost, practicality, and challenges faced in licensing the product. In this review we set out the different choices faced by veterinary vaccine developers, highlight some issues, and propose some pressing needs to be addressed. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#247,339
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#21
of 13,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,325
of 402,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#6
of 1,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.