You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Bioinformatics Based Approaches to Study Virus–Host Interactions During Chikungunya Virus Infection
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 17 |
| Book title |
Chikungunya Virus
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3618-2_17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3616-8, 978-1-4939-3618-2
|
| Authors |
Sreejith Rajasekharan, Sanjay Gupta |
| Editors |
Justin Jang Hann Chu, Swee Kim Ang |
| Abstract |
The limitations of high-throughput genomic methods used for studying virus-host interactions make it difficult to directly obtain insights on virus pathogenesis. In this chapter, the central steps of a protein structure similarity based computational approach used to predict the host interactors of Chikungunya virus are explained by highlighting the important aspects that need to be considered. Identification of such conserved set of putative interactions that allow the virus to take control of the host has the potential to deepen our understanding of the virus-specific remodeling processes of the host cell and illuminate new arenas of disease intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,519
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,826
of 340,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.