You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
Thomas Kramps, Knut Elbers
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 154 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||138||90%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||6||4%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||5%|
|Student > Master||3||5%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||3%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||2%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||6%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||2||3%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||2%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,969,131 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
of 14,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 432,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
of 1,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,969,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.