Chapter title |
Data Mining Techniques for the Life Sciences
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Data Mining Techniques for the Life Sciences
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3572-7_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3570-3, 978-1-4939-3572-7
|
Authors |
Orsini, Massimiliano, Cuccuru, Gianmauro, Uva, Paolo, Fotia, Giorgio, Massimiliano Orsini, Gianmauro Cuccuru, Paolo Uva, Giorgio Fotia |
Editors |
Oliviero Carugo, Frank Eisenhaber |
Abstract |
Bacterial genome sequencing is now an affordable choice for many laboratories for applications in research, diagnostic, and clinical microbiology. Nowadays, an overabundance of tools is available for genomic data analysis. However, tools differ for algorithms, languages, hardware requirements, and user interface, and combining them as it is necessary for sequence data interpretation often requires (bio)informatics skills which can be difficult to find in many laboratories. In addition, multiple data sources, as well as exceedingly large dataset sizes, and increasingly computational complexity further challenge the accessibility, reproducibility, and transparency of the entire process. In this chapter we will cover the main bioinformatics steps required for a complete bacterial genome analysis using next-generation sequencing data, from the raw sequence data to assembled and annotated genomes. All the tools described are available in the Orione framework ( http://orione.crs4.it ), which uniquely combines in a transparent way the most used open source bioinformatics tools for microbiology, allowing microbiologist without any specific hardware or informatics skill to conduct data-intensive computational analyses from quality control to microbial gene annotation. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
Computer Science | 3 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
Engineering | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |