↓ Skip to main content

HIV Vaccines and Cure

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Measuring HIV Persistence on Antiretroviral Therapy
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measuring HIV Persistence on Antiretroviral Therapy
Chapter number 11
Book title
HIV Vaccines and Cure
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0484-2_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-130483-5, 978-9-81-130484-2
Authors

Bethany A. Horsburgh, Sarah Palmer, Horsburgh, Bethany A., Palmer, Sarah

Abstract

In order to determine if an eradication strategy for HIV is effective, it will be important to measure persistent replication-competent virus, the current barrier to a cure. Various assays are available that measure persistent virus, each with advantages and disadvantages that must be balanced in order to select the best assay for the experimental aim. Assays of free virus do not measure the latent form of the virus but can be utilised in conjunction with other assays in order to better understand HIV persistence on ART. The quantitative viral outgrowth assay (QVOA) is the gold standard assay for measuring persistent replication-competent virus, but it, along with assays that vary the classical QVOA method, underestimates the frequency of latently infected cells in blood due to the presence of non-induced yet intact and replication-competent proviruses. Assays that quantify or sequence specific genomic regions of HIV overestimate the size of the reservoir as they are unable to distinguish between intact and defective virus. As an alternative, sequencing the full-length integrated genome can better distinguish replication-competent provirus, but these methods may be expensive and time-consuming. Novel assays, and the application of these assays to novel questions, will be key to the development of future curative therapies for HIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,528
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,149
of 442,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#111
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.