↓ Skip to main content

T-Cell Development

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'T-Cell Development'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 T-Cell Development
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Development of γδ T Cells, the Special-Force Soldiers of the Immune System
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Genetic Tools to Study T Cell Development
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Assessment of T Cell Development by Flow Cytometry
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Flow Cytometry Analysis of Thymic Epithelial Cells and Their Subpopulations.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Identifying the Spatial Relationships of Thymic Stromal and Thymocyte Subsets by Immunofluorescence Analysis.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Purification of Thymocyte and T Cell Subsets
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Retroviral Transduction of T Cells and T Cell Precursors
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 T-Cell Development
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Vitro Analyses of T Cell Effector Differentiation
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Studying T Cell Development in Thymic Slices
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 FTOC-Based Analysis of Negative Selection.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Reconstituted Thymus Organ Culture
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Induction of T Cell Development In Vitro by Delta-Like (Dll)-Expressing Stromal Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 In Vitro Analysis of Thymocyte Signaling
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Molecular Analysis of Mouse T Cell Receptor α and β Gene Rearrangements.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Intrathymic Injection
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Analysis of Cell Proliferation and Homeostasis Using EdU Labeling
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Characterization and Isolation of Human T Cell Progenitors
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Approaches to Study Human T Cell Development
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Humanized Mice to Study Human T Cell Development.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Using the Zebrafish Model to Study T Cell Development.
Attention for Chapter 22: Using the Zebrafish Model to Study T Cell Development.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Using the Zebrafish Model to Study T Cell Development.
Chapter number 22
Book title
T-Cell Development
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2809-5_22
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2808-8, 978-1-4939-2809-5
Authors

Zhang, Yong, Wiest, David L, Yong Zhang, David L. Wiest

Abstract

While zebrafish have for some time been regarded as a powerful model organism with which to study early events in hematopoiesis, recent evidence suggests that it also ideal for unraveling the molecular requirements for T cell development in the thymus. Like mammals, zebrafish possess an adaptive immune system, comprising B lymphocytes as well as both the γδ and αβ lineages of T cells, which develop in the thymus. Moreover, the molecular processes underlying T cell development in zebrafish appear to be remarkably conserved. Thus, findings in the zebrafish model will be of high relevance to the equivalent processes in mammals. Finally, molecular processes can be interrogated in zebrafish far more rapidly than is possible in mammals because the zebrafish possesses many unique advantages. These unique attributes, and the methods by which they can be exploited to investigate the role of novel genes in T cell development, are described here.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,344,095
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,343
of 13,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,840
of 393,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#545
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.