Chapter title |
Analysis of Whole Mitogenomes from Ancient Samples
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 13 |
Book title |
Whole Genome Amplification
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2990-0_13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2989-4, 978-1-4939-2990-0
|
Authors |
Gloria Gonzales Fortes, Johanna L. A. Paijmans, Fortes, Gloria Gonzales, Paijmans, Johanna L. A. |
Abstract |
Ancient mitochondrial DNA has been used in a wide variety of paleontological and archeological studies, ranging from population dynamics of extinct species to patterns of domestication. Most of these studies have traditionally been based on the analysis of short fragments from the mitochondrial control region, analyzed using PCR coupled with Sanger sequencing. With the introduction of high-throughput sequencing, as well as new enrichment technologies, the recovery of full mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) from ancient specimens has become significantly less complicated. Here we present a protocol to build ancient extracts into Illumina high-throughput sequencing libraries, and subsequent Agilent array-based capture to enrich for the desired mitogenome. Both are based on previously published protocols, with the introduction of several improvements aimed to increase the recovery of short DNA fragments, while keeping the cost and effort requirements low. This protocol was designed for enrichment of mitochondrial DNA in ancient or other degraded samples. However, the protocols can be easily adapted for using for building libraries for shotgun-sequencing of whole genomes, or enrichment of other genomic regions. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
Researcher | 21 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 41% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |