↓ Skip to main content

Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Physical Chemical and Biomolecular Methods for the Optimization of Cationic Lipid-Based Lipoplexes In Vitro for the Gene Therapy Applications
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Lipoplexes from Non-viral Cationic Vectors: DOTAP-DOPE Liposomes and Gemini Micelles
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Anionic/Zwitterionic Lipid-Based Gene Vectors of pDNA
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Elaboration and Physicochemical Characterization of Niosome-Based Nioplexes for Gene Delivery Purposes
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Quantitative Intracellular Localization of Cationic Lipid–Nucleic Acid Nanoparticles with Fluorescence Microscopy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Targeted Delivery of Peptide-Tagged DNA Lipoplexes to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Lipoplexes Strengthened by Anionic Polymers: Easy Preparation of Highly Effective siRNA Vectors Based on Cationic Lipids and Anionic Polymers
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Polymer Based Gene Silencing: In Vitro Delivery of SiRNA
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Polyallylamine Derivatives: Novel NonToxic Transfection Agents
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Biodegradable Three-Layered Micelles and Injectable Hydrogels
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Characterization and Investigation of Redox-Sensitive Liposomes for Gene Delivery
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 From Artificial Amino Acids to Sequence-Defined Targeted Oligoaminoamides
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Gene Delivery Method Using Photo-Responsive Poly(β-Amino Ester) as Vectors
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Thermo-Responsive Polyplex Micelles with PEG Shells and PNIPAM Layer to Protect DNA Cores for Systemic Gene Therapy
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Application of Polyethylenimine-Grafted Silicon Nanowire Arrays for Gene Transfection
Attention for Chapter 2: Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors
Chapter number 2
Book title
Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3718-9_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3716-5, 978-1-4939-3718-9
Authors

Jubeli, Emile, Goldring, William P D, Pungente, Michael D, Emile Jubeli, William P. D. Goldring, Michael D. Pungente

Abstract

The delivery of nucleic acids into cells remains an important laboratory cell culture technique and potential clinical therapy, based upon the initial cellular uptake, then translation into protein (in the case of DNA), or gene deletion by RNA interference (RNAi). Although viral delivery vectors are more efficient, the high production costs, limited cargo capacity, and the potential for clinical adverse events make nonviral strategies attractive. Cationic lipids are the most widely applied and studied nonviral vectors; however, much remains to be solved to overcome limitations of these systems. Advances in the field of cationic lipid-based nucleic acid (lipoplex) delivery rely upon the development of robust and reproducible lipoplex formulations, together with the use of cell culture assays. This chapter provides detailed protocols towards the formulation, delivery, and assessment of in vitro cationic lipid-based delivery of DNA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Chemistry 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,466,238
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,924
of 13,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,559
of 393,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#845
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.