You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2599-5_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2598-8, 978-1-4939-2599-5
|
| Authors |
Hu, Honghua, Manos, Jim, Honghua Hu, Jim Manos |
| Abstract |
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a technique used for the separation of high molecular weight restriction fragments from digested bacterial genomic DNA on a gel matrix by applying an electric field that periodically changes direction. PFGE has been shown to be the most discriminatory and reproducible bacterial strain typing technique available. It is considered the 'gold standard' in epidemiological studies of pathogenic and nonpathogenic microorganisms. This chapter provides a detailed method for using PFGE in the genotyping of the opportunistic Gram-negative bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,273,512
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,905
of 13,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,802
of 353,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#635
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.