↓ Skip to main content

3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture

Overview of attention for book
Cover of '3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 In Memoriam: Joseph Leighton, 1921–1999—Father of 3-Dimensional Tissue Culture
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture: An Overview
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vivo-Like Growth Patterns of Multiple Types of Tumors in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Expression and Targeting of Tumor Markers in Gelfoam® Histoculture: Potential Individualized Assays for Immuno-Oncology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Development of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA)
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Diagnosis and Pathological Analysis of Patient Cancers by Detection of Proliferating Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay in Gastrointestinal Cancer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Prospective Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Ovarian Cancer
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Head and Neck Cancer
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Breast Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostate Hypertrophy (BPH)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 In Vivo-Like Cell-Cycle Phase Distribution of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture Observed in Real Time by FUCCI Imaging
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Methionine Dependency Determination of Human Patient Tumors in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Hair-Shaft Growth in Gelfoam® Histoculture of Skin and Isolated Hair Follicles
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Hair Follicle-Associated Pluripotent (HAP) Stem Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture for Use in Spinal Cord Repair
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Nerve Growth and Interaction in Gelfoam® Histoculture: A Nervous System Organoid
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Histoculture and Infection with HIV of Functional Human Lymphoid Tissue on Gelfoam®
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Imaging DNA Repair After UV Irradiation Damage of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Comparison of “Dimensionality” of Cancer Cell Culture in Gelfoam® Histoculture and Matrigel
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Imaging the Governing Step of Metastasis in Gelfoam® Histoculture
Attention for Chapter 10: Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Breast Cancer
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Breast Cancer
Chapter number 10
Book title
3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7745-1_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7743-7, 978-1-4939-7745-1
Authors

Robert M. Hoffman, Hirokazu Tanino

Abstract

The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) was used to compare drug sensitivity of recurrent and primary breast cancer in vitro as well as in the clinic. The HDRA utilizes 3-dimensional culture of human tumors on Gelfoam®. The evaluation rate was 98.8%. The HDRA mean inhibition rate of primary tumors vs. recurrent tumors was, respectively, 57.9% and 38.6% for doxorubicin (DOX); 59.9% and 42.8% for mitomycin C (MMC); 49.0% and 33.4% for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); and 34.5% and 16.0% for cisplatinum (CDDP). The recurrent cases were pretreated clinically with CAF (cyclophosphamide [CTX], DOX, and 5-FU), CEF (CTX, epirubicin [EPN], and 5-FU), or CMF (CTX, methotrexate [MTX], and 5-FU). 64.7% of the recurrent cases were resistant to all four agents tested compared to 27% of the primary cases. Only 5.9% of the recurrent cases were sensitive to three or more agents as opposed to 18% of the primary cases. The correlation of the HDRA results to clinical outcome in another breast-cancer study was 80.0% with 15 cases evaluated consisting of five true positives, three false positives, seven true negatives, and no false negatives. HDRA was also performed on surgical specimens of primary tumor and axillary lymph node metastasis from each of 30 breast cancer patients. The lymph-node metastases were more resistant than the primary tumor for DOX, 5-FU, and MMC, but not for CDDP. The data suggest that both primary tumor and metastases from individual patients should be tested in the HDRA to enhance clinical efficacy of chemotherapy. There also was a lack of correlation with breast cancer subtype and drug response in the HDRA, further suggesting the importance of individualized treatment for breast cancer patients afforded by the HDRA.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%