↓ Skip to main content

3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture

Overview of attention for book
Cover of '3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 In Memoriam: Joseph Leighton, 1921–1999—Father of 3-Dimensional Tissue Culture
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture: An Overview
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vivo-Like Growth Patterns of Multiple Types of Tumors in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Expression and Targeting of Tumor Markers in Gelfoam® Histoculture: Potential Individualized Assays for Immuno-Oncology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Development of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA)
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Diagnosis and Pathological Analysis of Patient Cancers by Detection of Proliferating Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay in Gastrointestinal Cancer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Prospective Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Ovarian Cancer
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Head and Neck Cancer
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Breast Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostate Hypertrophy (BPH)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 In Vivo-Like Cell-Cycle Phase Distribution of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture Observed in Real Time by FUCCI Imaging
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Methionine Dependency Determination of Human Patient Tumors in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Hair-Shaft Growth in Gelfoam® Histoculture of Skin and Isolated Hair Follicles
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Hair Follicle-Associated Pluripotent (HAP) Stem Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture for Use in Spinal Cord Repair
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Nerve Growth and Interaction in Gelfoam® Histoculture: A Nervous System Organoid
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Histoculture and Infection with HIV of Functional Human Lymphoid Tissue on Gelfoam®
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Imaging DNA Repair After UV Irradiation Damage of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Comparison of “Dimensionality” of Cancer Cell Culture in Gelfoam® Histoculture and Matrigel
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Imaging the Governing Step of Metastasis in Gelfoam® Histoculture
Attention for Chapter 5: Development of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA)
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Development of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA)
Chapter number 5
Book title
3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7745-1_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7743-7, 978-1-4939-7745-1
Authors

Robert M. Hoffman, Robert A. Vescio, Hoffman, Robert M., Vescio, Robert A.

Abstract

The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) was developed using Gelfoam®histoculture of all tumor types. Twenty tumor classes, including all the major ones, have been histocultured on Gelfoam®and tested for drug response. Quantitative and qualitative results show increasing cell kill with rising cytotoxic drug concentration, differential drug sensitivities of multiple cell types within individual cultured tumors, differential sensitivities to a single drug of a series of tumors of the same histopathological classification, differential sensitivities of individual tumors to a series of drugs, and sensitivity patterns of various tumor types similar to the sensitivities found in vivo. Therefore, the results indicated that precise therapeutic data can be obtained from tumor specimens growing in Gelfoam®histoculture in vitro for the individual cancer patient as well as for rational and relevant screening for novel agents active against human solid tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Other 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,934,709
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,298
of 13,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,419
of 442,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#869
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.