↓ Skip to main content

3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture

Overview of attention for book
Cover of '3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 In Memoriam: Joseph Leighton, 1921–1999—Father of 3-Dimensional Tissue Culture
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture: An Overview
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vivo-Like Growth Patterns of Multiple Types of Tumors in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Expression and Targeting of Tumor Markers in Gelfoam® Histoculture: Potential Individualized Assays for Immuno-Oncology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Development of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA)
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Diagnosis and Pathological Analysis of Patient Cancers by Detection of Proliferating Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay in Gastrointestinal Cancer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Prospective Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Ovarian Cancer
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Head and Neck Cancer
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Breast Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostate Hypertrophy (BPH)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 In Vivo-Like Cell-Cycle Phase Distribution of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture Observed in Real Time by FUCCI Imaging
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Methionine Dependency Determination of Human Patient Tumors in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Hair-Shaft Growth in Gelfoam® Histoculture of Skin and Isolated Hair Follicles
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Hair Follicle-Associated Pluripotent (HAP) Stem Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture for Use in Spinal Cord Repair
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Nerve Growth and Interaction in Gelfoam® Histoculture: A Nervous System Organoid
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Histoculture and Infection with HIV of Functional Human Lymphoid Tissue on Gelfoam®
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Imaging DNA Repair After UV Irradiation Damage of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Comparison of “Dimensionality” of Cancer Cell Culture in Gelfoam® Histoculture and Matrigel
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Imaging the Governing Step of Metastasis in Gelfoam® Histoculture
Attention for Chapter 9: Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Head and Neck Cancer
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Head and Neck Cancer
Chapter number 9
Book title
3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7745-1_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7743-7, 978-1-4939-7745-1
Authors

Robert M. Hoffman

Abstract

Gelfoam® histoculture was utilized to develop the histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) for head and neck cancer. Specimens of head and neck tumors were evaluated for sensitivity to the following drugs: cisplatinum (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and the combination of CDDP and 5-FU. In the first clinical study at UCSD, 10 of 12 patients with tumors that were drug sensitive in Gelfoam® histoculture had either complete or partial response clinically. Comparisons of HDRA results, obtained with [3H]thymidine incorporation as the endpoint were made with clinical responses, i.e., complete response, partial response, or no response. The overall accuracy of the HDRA was 74% in this correlative clinical trial; the predictive positive value was 83%, the sensitivity was 71%, and the specificity was 78%. Seven of 11 patients with HDRA-resistant tumors demonstrated no response for a predictive negative value of 64%. In a subsequent study at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, tumor specimens from 41 to 42 patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer were successfully evaluated by the HDRA. The histocultured tumors were treated with 5-FU and/or CDDP and a control group received no drug treatment. After completion of drug treatment, the relative cell survival in the tumors was determined using the MTT endpoint. Sensitivity was defined as a tumor inhibition rate (IR) of greater than 30%. Survival comparisons were performed using the generalized Wilcoxon test for the comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Resistance to 5-FU was observed in 13 cases (32%), to CDDP in 13 cases (32%), and to both agents in 11 cases (27%). The 2-year cause-specific survival was significantly greater for patients sensitive to 5-FU than patients who were resistant (85% vs. 64%), CDDP (86% vs. 64%), or both agents (85% vs. 63%). These results demonstrate the clinical usefulness of the HDRA for head and neck cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 100%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%