You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
In Vivo-Like Cell-Cycle Phase Distribution of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture Observed in Real Time by FUCCI Imaging
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7745-1_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7743-7, 978-1-4939-7745-1
|
| Authors |
Robert M. Hoffman, Shuya Yano |
| Abstract |
FUCCI color codes cells as they express different color fluorescent proteins as they go through phases of the cell cycle. The cell cycle phase distribution of cancer cells in Gelfoam® histoculture was similar to in vivo tumors, whereby only the surface cells proliferate and interior cells are quiescent in G0/G1. In contrast, in 2D cancer-cell culture, most of the cells are always cycling. The cancer cells responded similarly to toxic chemotherapy in Gelfoam® culture as in vivo; as such, therapy is cell cycle dependent. In 2D culture, cancer cells were much more chemosensitive. These results indicate why the drug response pattern of tumors in Gelfoam® histoculture reflects what is observed in vivo. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,974
of 13,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,587
of 442,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.