↓ Skip to main content

3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture

Overview of attention for book
Cover of '3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 In Memoriam: Joseph Leighton, 1921–1999—Father of 3-Dimensional Tissue Culture
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture: An Overview
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vivo-Like Growth Patterns of Multiple Types of Tumors in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Expression and Targeting of Tumor Markers in Gelfoam® Histoculture: Potential Individualized Assays for Immuno-Oncology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Development of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA)
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Diagnosis and Pathological Analysis of Patient Cancers by Detection of Proliferating Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay in Gastrointestinal Cancer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Prospective Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Ovarian Cancer
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Clinical Correlation of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Head and Neck Cancer
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Breast Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clinical Usefulness of the Histoculture Drug Response Assay for Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostate Hypertrophy (BPH)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 In Vivo-Like Cell-Cycle Phase Distribution of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture Observed in Real Time by FUCCI Imaging
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Methionine Dependency Determination of Human Patient Tumors in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Hair-Shaft Growth in Gelfoam® Histoculture of Skin and Isolated Hair Follicles
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Hair Follicle-Associated Pluripotent (HAP) Stem Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture for Use in Spinal Cord Repair
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Nerve Growth and Interaction in Gelfoam® Histoculture: A Nervous System Organoid
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Histoculture and Infection with HIV of Functional Human Lymphoid Tissue on Gelfoam®
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Imaging DNA Repair After UV Irradiation Damage of Cancer Cells in Gelfoam® Histoculture
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Comparison of “Dimensionality” of Cancer Cell Culture in Gelfoam® Histoculture and Matrigel
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Imaging the Governing Step of Metastasis in Gelfoam® Histoculture
Attention for Chapter 19: Comparison of “Dimensionality” of Cancer Cell Culture in Gelfoam® Histoculture and Matrigel
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Comparison of “Dimensionality” of Cancer Cell Culture in Gelfoam® Histoculture and Matrigel
Chapter number 19
Book title
3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7745-1_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7743-7, 978-1-4939-7745-1
Authors

Yasunori Tome, Fuminari Uehara, Fuminori Kanaya, Robert M. Hoffman

Abstract

Cell and tissue culture can be performed on different substrates such as on plastic, in Matrigel™, and on Gelfoam®, a sponge matrix. Each of these substrates consists of a very different surface, ranging from hard and inflexible, a gel, and a sponge-matrix, respectively. Folkman and Moscona found that cell shape was tightly coupled to proper gene expression. The flexibility of a substrate is important for cells to maintain their optimal shape. Human osteosarcoma cells, stably expressing a fusion protein of avintegrin, and green fluorescent protein (GFP), grew as a simple monolayer without any structure formation on the surface of a plastic dish. When the osteosarcoma cells were cultured within Matrigel, the cancer cells formed colonies but no other structures. When the cancer cells were seeded on Gelfoam®, the cells formed 3-dimensional tissue-like structures. These results indicate that Gelfoam®histoculture, unlike Matrigel™ culture, is true 3-dimensional.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,469,520
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,953
of 13,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,217
of 442,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,194
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.