↓ Skip to main content

Kinase Signaling Networks

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Kinase Signaling Networks'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Optogenetic Control of Ras/Erk Signaling Using the Phy–PIF System
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Dissecting Kinase Effector Signaling Using the RapRTAP Methodology
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Single-Cell Imaging of ERK Signaling Using Fluorescent Biosensors
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Quantification of Cell Signaling Networks Using Kinase Activity Chemosensors
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Expression of Recombinant Phosphoproteins for Signal Transduction Studies
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Allosteric Modulation of Src Family Kinases with ATP-Competitive Inhibitors
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Characterization of Ligand Binding to Pseudokinases Using a Thermal Shift Assay
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Proteomic Profiling of Protein Kinase Inhibitor Targets by Mass Spectrometry
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Utilizing the Luminex Magnetic Bead-Based Suspension Array for Rapid Multiplexed Phosphoprotein Quantification
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 High-Content Imaging and RNAi Screens for Investigating Kinase Network Plasticity
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Analysis of Drug Resistance Using Kinome-Wide Functional Screens
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Identification and Validation of Driver Kinases from Next-Generation Sequencing Data
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Label-Free Phosphoproteomic Approach for Kinase Signaling Analysis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Cell-Specific Labeling for Analyzing Bidirectional Signaling by Mass Spectrometry
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Characterization of the Phospho-Adhesome by Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Analysis of Phosphotyrosine Signaling Networks in Lung Cancer Cell Lines
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Targeted Analysis of Phosphotyrosine Signaling by Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Isolated Mitochondria in Yeast
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A Methodology for Comprehensive Analysis of Toll-Like Receptor Signaling in Macrophages
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Absolute Phosphorylation Stoichiometry Analysis by Motif-Targeting Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Identification of Plant Kinase Substrates Based on Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Spatial Protein Networks by Colocalization Analysis (COLA)
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Development of Selected Reaction Monitoring Methods to Systematically Quantify Kinase Abundance and Phosphorylation Stoichiometry in Human Samples
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Analysis of Signaling Networks at the Single-Cell Level Using Mass Cytometry
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)-Based Methods for Examining Cancer Metabolism in Response to Oncogenic Kinase Drug Treatment
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Deconstructing the Metabolic Networks of Oncogenic Signaling Using Targeted Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Modeling of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling: Computational and Experimental Protocols
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 An Interdisciplinary Approach for Designing Kinetic Models of the Ras/MAPK Signaling Pathway
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Databases and Computational Tools for Evolutionary Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Informatics Approaches for Predicting, Understanding, and Testing Cancer Drug Combinations
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Target Inhibition Maps Based on Responses to Kinase Inhibitors
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Partial Least Squares Regression Models for the Analysis of Kinase Signaling
Attention for Chapter 21: Identification of Plant Kinase Substrates Based on Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Identification of Plant Kinase Substrates Based on Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics
Chapter number 21
Book title
Kinase Signaling Networks
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7154-1_21
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7152-7, 978-1-4939-7154-1
Authors

Hsu, Chuan-Chih, Arrington, Justine V., Xue, Liang, Tao, W. Andy, Chuan-Chih Hsu, Justine V. Arrington, Liang Xue, W. Andy Tao

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is one of the key events in the regulation of plant physiological responses to diverse environmental stimuli. As crucial regulators of phosphorylation, protein kinases have been linked to the control of seed germination, flowering, and stress responses. Identifying downstream substrates of kinases is important for dissecting kinase-substrate networks as well as delineating the underlying defense mechanisms in response to extracellular stimulation. Despite the fact that thousands of kinase-substrate networks have been identified in mammalian cells, the downstream substrates of important plant kinases are still elusive. Moreover, it remains challenging to identify bona fide kinase substrates from proteome-wide analyses. Thus, developing methodologies with high sensitivity and specificity is imperative for understanding plant kinase-substrate cascades. Here, we describe a proteomic strategy termed kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics (KALIP) approach for large-scale identification of the direct substrates of plant kinases with high sensitivity and a low false-positive rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Chemistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,562,247
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,950
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,894
of 314,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#169
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.