You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Purification and Adoptive Transfer of Group 3 Gut Innate Lymphoid Cells.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 18 |
| Book title |
Gastrointestinal Physiology and Diseases
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3603-8_18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3601-4, 978-1-4939-3603-8
|
| Authors |
Xiaohuan Guo, Kevin Muite, Joanna Wroblewska, Yang-Xin Fu |
| Editors |
Andrei I. Ivanov |
| Abstract |
Recent studies have identified several related but distinct innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) populations that are relatively enriched in the intestinal mucosal and protect the host from various infections. Among ILCs, group 3 ILCs (ILC3s) produce lymphotoxin and IL-22, and play important roles in the development of the immune system and host-bacteria interactions. Here, we describe methods for the isolation and purification of ILC3s from the mouse intestine, and the adoptive transfer of purified ILC3s into recipient mice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,395,259
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,356
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,046
of 393,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#545
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.