↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Typing of Blood Cell Antigens

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Molecular Typing of Blood Cell Antigens'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Validation of Genotyping Protocols for Diagnostic Use
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 High-resolution melting analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 High-Speed Droplet-Allele-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction for Genotyping of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Blood Grouping Based on PCR Methods and Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Parallel Donor Genotyping for 46 Selected Blood Group and 4 Human Platelet Antigens Using High-Throughput MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 PCR with Sequence-Specific Primers for Typing of Diallelic Blood Groups
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 High-resolution melting analysis for genotyping duffy blood group antigens.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Molecular RHD - RHCE Analysis by Multiplex PCR of Short Fluorescent Fragments
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Microarrays in Blood Group Genotyping
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Next-Generation Sequencing for Antenatal Prediction of KEL1 Blood Group Status.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 454-Sequencing™ for the KEL, JR, and LAN Blood Groups.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Noninvasive Prenatal Blood Group Genotyping
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Genotyping of Human Platelet Antigens by BeadChip Microarray Technology
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Sequence-Based Typing for Platelet alloantigens
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Miniaturized Technology for DNA Typing: Cassette PCR
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Geno- and Phenotyping of Human Neutrophil Antigens
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Allelic Discrimination by TaqMan-PCR for Genotyping of Human Neutrophil Antigens
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Novel Approaches and Technologies in Molecular HLA Typing.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Luminex-Based Methods in High-Resolution HLA Typing
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 In Silico HLA Typing Using Standard RNA-Seq Sequence Reads.
Attention for Chapter 20: In Silico HLA Typing Using Standard RNA-Seq Sequence Reads.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
In Silico HLA Typing Using Standard RNA-Seq Sequence Reads.
Chapter number 20
Book title
Molecular Typing of Blood Cell Antigens
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2690-9_20
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2689-3, 978-1-4939-2690-9
Authors

Boegel, Sebastian, Scholtalbers, Jelle, Löwer, Martin, Sahin, Ugur, Castle, John C, Sebastian Boegel, Jelle Scholtalbers, Martin Löwer, Ugur Sahin, John C. Castle, Castle, John C.

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables high-throughput transcriptome profiling using the RNA-Seq assay, resulting in billions of short sequence reads. Worldwide adoption has been rapid: many laboratories worldwide generate transcriptome sequence reads daily. Here, we describe methods for obtaining a sample's human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II types and HLA expression using standard NGS RNA-Seq sequence reads. We demonstrate the application using our algorithm, seq2HLA, and a publicly available RNA-Seq dataset from the Burkitt lymphoma cell line Raji.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,657,832
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#831
of 14,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,900
of 365,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#52
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.