↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Typing of Blood Cell Antigens

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Molecular Typing of Blood Cell Antigens'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Validation of Genotyping Protocols for Diagnostic Use
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 High-resolution melting analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 High-Speed Droplet-Allele-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction for Genotyping of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Blood Grouping Based on PCR Methods and Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Parallel Donor Genotyping for 46 Selected Blood Group and 4 Human Platelet Antigens Using High-Throughput MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 PCR with Sequence-Specific Primers for Typing of Diallelic Blood Groups
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 High-resolution melting analysis for genotyping duffy blood group antigens.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Molecular RHD - RHCE Analysis by Multiplex PCR of Short Fluorescent Fragments
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Microarrays in Blood Group Genotyping
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Next-Generation Sequencing for Antenatal Prediction of KEL1 Blood Group Status.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 454-Sequencing™ for the KEL, JR, and LAN Blood Groups.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Noninvasive Prenatal Blood Group Genotyping
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Genotyping of Human Platelet Antigens by BeadChip Microarray Technology
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Sequence-Based Typing for Platelet alloantigens
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Miniaturized Technology for DNA Typing: Cassette PCR
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Geno- and Phenotyping of Human Neutrophil Antigens
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Allelic Discrimination by TaqMan-PCR for Genotyping of Human Neutrophil Antigens
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Novel Approaches and Technologies in Molecular HLA Typing.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Luminex-Based Methods in High-Resolution HLA Typing
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 In Silico HLA Typing Using Standard RNA-Seq Sequence Reads.
Attention for Chapter 18: Novel Approaches and Technologies in Molecular HLA Typing.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Novel Approaches and Technologies in Molecular HLA Typing.
Chapter number 18
Book title
Molecular Typing of Blood Cell Antigens
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2690-9_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2689-3, 978-1-4939-2690-9
Authors

Dunn, Paul P J, Paul P. J. Dunn

Abstract

The invention of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) has revolutionized molecular biology enabling gene isolation and characterization in hours rather than days. Scientists working in transplant diagnostics have proven to be pioneers in adapting this molecular technique to the clinical needs of histocompatibility testing. This chapter describes a number of novel genotyping technologies which have been used to address the challenges posed by genetic diversity seen in the extensive polymorphism in HLA genes. These novel approaches include single-stranded and duplex conformational analyses, real-time PCR, microarray hybridization, RNA-based sequencing, and the present day Next Generation Sequencing. The chapter concludes with a brief look at a possible next, Next Generation Sequencing system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Other 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 30%
Unspecified 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,810,584
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,086
of 13,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,662
of 355,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#498
of 1,004 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,004 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.