↓ Skip to main content

High Throughput Screening

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'High Throughput Screening'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Design and Implementation of High-Throughput Screening Assays
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Characterization of Inhibitor Binding Through Multiple Inhibitor Analysis: A Novel Local Fitting Method
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 High Throughput Screening
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Commercially Available Compound Libraries
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 AlphaScreen-Based Assays: Ultra-High-Throughput Screening for Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Challenging Enzymes and Protein-Protein Interactions
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Instrument Quality Control
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Application of Fluorescence Polarization in HTS Assays
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Time-Resolved Fluorescence Assays
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Protein Kinase Selectivity Profiling Using Microfluid Mobility Shift Assays
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Screening for Inhibitors of Kinase Autophosphorylation
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Fluorescence-Based High-Throughput Screening Assay to Identify Growth Inhibitors of the Pathogenic Fungus Aspergillus fumigatus
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 High Throughput Screening
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Identification of State-Dependent Blockers for Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels Using a FLIPR-Based Assay
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Luciferase Reporter Gene System for High-Throughput Screening of γ -Globin Gene Activators
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A High-Throughput Flow Cytometry Assay for Identification of Inhibitors of 3′,5′-Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Efflux
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 High-Throughput Cell Toxicity Assays
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 BRET: NanoLuc-Based Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer Platform to Monitor Protein-Protein Interactions in Live Cells
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Application of Imaging-Based Assays in Microplate Formats for High-Content Screening
Attention for Chapter 5: AlphaScreen-Based Assays: Ultra-High-Throughput Screening for Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Challenging Enzymes and Protein-Protein Interactions
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
AlphaScreen-Based Assays: Ultra-High-Throughput Screening for Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Challenging Enzymes and Protein-Protein Interactions
Chapter number 5
Book title
High Throughput Screening
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3673-1_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3671-7, 978-1-4939-3673-1
Authors

Adam Yasgar, Ajit Jadhav, Anton Simeonov, Nathan P. Coussens, Yasgar, Adam, Jadhav, Ajit, Simeonov, Anton, Coussens, Nathan P.

Abstract

AlphaScreen technology has been routinely utilized in high-throughput screening assays to quantify analyte accumulation or depletion, bimolecular interactions, and post-translational modifications. The high signal-to-background, dynamic range, and sensitivity associated with AlphaScreens as well as the homogenous assay format and reagent stability make the technology particularly well suited for high-throughput screening applications. Here, we describe the development of AlphaScreen assays to identify small-molecule inhibitors of enzymes and protein-protein interactions using the highly miniaturized 1536-well format. The subsequent implementation of counter assays to identify false-positive compounds is also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 25%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 31%
Chemistry 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#822
of 14,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,276
of 405,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#133
of 1,468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.