You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
The Effect of Alcohol on Sirt1 Expression and Function in Animal and Human Models of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Biological Basis of Alcohol-Induced Cancer
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-09614-8_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-909613-1, 978-3-31-909614-8
|
Authors |
Thompson KJ, Humphries JR, Niemeyer DJ, Sindram D, McKillop IH, Kyle J. Thompson, John R. Humphries, David J. Niemeyer, David Sindram, Iain H. McKillop, Thompson, Kyle J., Humphries, John R., Niemeyer, David J., Sindram, David, McKillop, Iain H. |
Abstract |
Chronic heavy alcohol use is an independent risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sirtuin-1 (Sirt1) is a NAD+-dependent deacetylase implicated in alcohol-induced liver injury and overexpressed in human HCC. The aims of this study were to investigate Sirt1 expression in mouse models of HCC and chronic EtOH-feeding, and in human HCC cells expressing alcohol metabolizing enzymes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 41% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,965
of 4,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,179
of 361,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#208
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.