↓ Skip to main content

The Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococci

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'The Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococci'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 180 Restriction-Modification Systems as a Barrier for Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococcus aureus.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 181 The Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococci
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 182 Splicing by Overlap Extension PCR to Obtain Hybrid DNA Products
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 183 Method for Preparation and Electroporation of S. aureus and S. epidermidis
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 184 Rapid Isolation of DNA from Staphylococcus
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 185 Bacteriophage Transduction in Staphylococcus aureus: Broth-Based Method.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 186 Bacteriophage Transduction in Staphylococcus aureus.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 187 Allelic Exchange.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 188 Creation of Staphylococcal Mutant Libraries Using Transposon Tn917.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 189 Generation of a Transposon Mutant Library in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis Using bursa aurealis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 190 Chemical and UV Mutagenesis.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 191 Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 192 RNA-Sequencing of Staphylococcus aureus Messenger RNA.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 193 Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) Workflow for Analyzing Staphylococcus aureus Gene Expression.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 275 De Novo Assembly of Plasmids Using Yeast Recombinational Cloning.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 276 The Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococci
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 277 Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 281 Batch Transduction of Transposon Mutant Libraries for Rapid Phenotype Screening in Staphylococcus
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 282 Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends for RNA Transcript Sequencing in Staphylococcus
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 283 The Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococci
Attention for Chapter 180: Restriction-Modification Systems as a Barrier for Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococcus aureus.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Restriction-Modification Systems as a Barrier for Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococcus aureus.
Chapter number 180
Book title
The Genetic Manipulation of Staphylococci
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/7651_2014_180
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3157-6, 978-1-4939-3158-3
Authors

Marat R Sadykov, Sadykov MR, Marat R. Sadykov, Sadykov, Marat R.

Abstract

Genetic manipulation is a powerful approach to study fundamental aspects of bacterial physiology, metabolism, and pathogenesis. Most Staphylococcus aureus strains are remarkably difficult to genetically manipulate as they possess strong host defense mechanisms that protect bacteria from cellular invasion by foreign DNA. In S. aureus these bacterial "immunity" mechanisms against invading genomes are mainly associated with restriction-modification systems. To date, prokaryotic restriction-modification systems are classified into four different types (Type I-IV), all of which have been found in the sequenced S. aureus genomes. This chapter describes the roles, classification, mechanisms of action of different types of restriction-modification systems and the recent advances in the biology of restriction and modification in S. aureus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,175,585
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,478
of 13,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,726
of 360,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#265
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.