Chapter title |
Strategies for the Purification of Membrane Proteins.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Protein Chromatography
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6412-3_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6410-9, 978-1-4939-6412-3
|
Authors |
Sinéad M. Smith |
Editors |
Dermot Walls, Sinéad T. Loughran |
Abstract |
Although membrane proteins account for approximately 30 % of the coding regions of all sequenced genomes and play crucial roles in many fundamental cell processes, there are relatively few membranes with known 3D structure. This is likely due to technical challenges associated with membrane protein extraction, solubilization, and purification. Membrane proteins are classified based on the level of interaction with membrane lipid bilayers, with peripheral membrane proteins associating noncovalently with the membrane, and integral membrane proteins associating more strongly by means of hydrophobic interactions. Generally speaking, peripheral membrane proteins can be purified by milder techniques than integral membrane proteins, whose extraction require phospholipid bilayer disruption by detergents. Here, important criteria for strategies of membrane protein purification are addressed, with a focus on the initial stages of membrane protein solublilization, where problems are most frequently are encountered. Protocols are outlined for the successful extraction of peripheral membrane proteins, solubilization of integral membrane proteins, and detergent removal which is important not only for retaining native protein stability and biological functions, but also for the efficiency of downstream purification techniques. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 29% |
Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 14% |
Researcher | 28 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 9% |
Unknown | 43 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 96 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 18% |
Chemistry | 17 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 7% |
Unknown | 50 | 21% |