↓ Skip to main content

Polycomb Group Proteins

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Polycomb Group Proteins'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Polycomb Group Proteins
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Polycomb Group Proteins
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Polycomb Group Proteins
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Polycomb Group Proteins
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Polycomb Group Proteins
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Polycomb Group Proteins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Polycomb Group Proteins
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Polycomb Group Proteins
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Polycomb Group Proteins
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Polycomb Group Proteins
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Polycomb Group Proteins
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 The Dynamics of Polycomb Complexes.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Polycomb Group Proteins
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analysis of Endogenous Protein Interactions of Polycomb Group of Proteins in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Polycomb Group Proteins
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 An Automatic Segmentation Method Combining an Active Contour Model and a Classification Technique for Detecting Polycomb-group Proteinsin High-Throughput Microscopy Images.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Polycomb Group Proteins
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Polycomb Group Proteins
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Polycomb Group Proteins
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Polycomb Group Proteins
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Polycomb Group Proteins
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Polycomb Group Proteins
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 A Rapid TALEN Assembly Protocol.
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Polycomb Group Proteins
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Polycomb Group Proteins
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Polycomb Group Proteins
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Polycomb Group Proteins
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Erratum to: Chromatin Preparation and Chromatin Immuno-precipitation from Drosophila Embryos
Attention for Chapter 25: Polycomb Group Proteins
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Polycomb Group Proteins
Chapter number 25
Book title
Polycomb Group Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6380-5_25
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6378-2, 978-1-4939-6380-5
Authors

Malinowski, Andrzej R, Fisher, Amanda G, Andrzej R. Malinowski, Amanda G. Fisher

Editors

Chiara Lanzuolo, Beatrice Bodega

Abstract

Pluripotent reprogramming can be dominantly induced in a somatic nucleus upon fusion with a pluripotent cell such as embryonic stem (ES) cell. Cell fusion between ES cells and somatic cells results in the formation of heterokaryons, in which the somatic nuclei begin to acquire features of the pluripotent partner. The generation of interspecies heterokaryons between mouse ES- and human somatic cells allows an experimenter to distinguish the nuclear events occurring specifically within the reprogrammed nucleus. Therefore, cell fusion provides a simple and rapid approach to look at the early nuclear events underlying pluripotent reprogramming. Here, we describe a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated cell fusion protocol to generate interspecies heterokaryons and intraspecies hybrids between ES cells and B lymphocytes or fibroblasts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,472,072
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,924
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,591
of 393,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#845
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.