You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Express Analysis of Microalgal Secondary Carotenoids by TLC and UV-Vis Spectroscopy
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Microbial Carotenoids
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-8742-9_4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-8741-2, 978-1-4939-8742-9
|
| Authors |
Galina S. Minyuk, Alexei E. Solovchenko, Minyuk, Galina S., Solovchenko, Alexei E. |
| Abstract |
We elucidate the peculiarities of express analysis of secondary carotenoids from microalgae and their preliminary identification using TLC and UV-Vis spectroscopy with emphasis on biotechnologically significant producers of the value-added pigment astaxanthin. Advantages and limitations of the method are described to underline the value of TLC as a potential companion method to mainstream separation techniques such as HPLC. Special attention is paid to common errors and pitfalls of the method and possible work-arounds, as well as to overall strategy of the analysis, sample preparation, and material selection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,647,094
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,989
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,351
of 330,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#157
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.