↓ Skip to main content

Lung Innate Immunity and Inflammation

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Lung Innate Immunity and Inflammation'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 500 Million Alveoli from 30,000 Feet: A Brief Primer on Lung Anatomy
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Overview of Innate Lung Immunity and Inflammation
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation and Characterization of Mononuclear Phagocytes in the Mouse Lung and Lymph Nodes
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Isolation and Characterization of Mouse Neutrophils
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Isolation and Characterization of Mouse Fibroblasts
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Isolation of Rat and Mouse Alveolar Type II Epithelial Cells
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Isolation and Characterization of Human Alveolar Type II Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Air–Liquid Interface Culture of Human and Mouse Airway Epithelial Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolation and Characterization of Human Lung Myeloid Cells
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Measurement of Protein Permeability and Fluid Transport of Human Alveolar Epithelial Type II Cells Under Pathological Conditions
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Measuring Innate Immune Function in Mouse Mononuclear Phagocytes
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Measuring Neutrophil Bactericidal Activity
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Modulation of Myeloid Cell Function Using Conditional and Inducible Transgenic Approaches
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Modulation of Lung Epithelial Cell Function Using Conditional and Inducible Transgenic Approaches
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Computational Analysis of RNA-Seq Data from Airway Epithelial Cells for Studying Lung Disease
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Application of Proteomics in Lung Research
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Application of Metabolomics in Lung Research
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Functional Genomics in Murine Macrophages
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Assessment of Ozone-Induced Lung Injury in Mice
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Lung Histological Methods
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Intravital Microscopy in the Mouse Lung
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Mouse Models of Acute Lung Injury and ARDS
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Mouse Models of Asthma
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Animal Models of Pulmonary Fibrosis
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Mouse Models of COPD
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Mouse Models of Viral Infection
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Delivery of Therapeutics to the Lung
Attention for Chapter 9: Isolation and Characterization of Human Lung Myeloid Cells
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Isolation and Characterization of Human Lung Myeloid Cells
Chapter number 9
Book title
Lung Innate Immunity and Inflammation
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8570-8_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8569-2, 978-1-4939-8570-8
Authors

Yen-Rei A. Yu, Robert M. Tighe, Yu, Yen-Rei A., Tighe, Robert M.

Abstract

Multiparameter flow cytometry of human lungs allows for characterization, isolation, and examination of human pulmonary immune cell composition, phenotype, and function. Here we describe an approach to process lung tissues and then utilize a base antibody panel to define all of the major immune cell types in a single staining condition. This base antibody panel can also be used to identify major immune cell types in human blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,412
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,134
of 442,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.