You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Sodium channels and pain.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 3 |
Book title |
Pain Control
|
Published in |
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-662-46450-2_3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-66-246449-6, 978-3-66-246450-2
|
Authors |
Habib, Abdella M, Wood, John N, Cox, James J, Abdella M. Habib, John N. Wood, James J. Cox, Habib, Abdella M., Wood, John N., Cox, James J. |
Abstract |
Human and mouse genetic studies have led to significant advances in our understanding of the role of voltage-gated sodium channels in pain pathways. In this chapter, we focus on Nav1.7, Nav1.8, Nav1.9 and Nav1.3 and describe the insights gained from the detailed analyses of global and conditional transgenic Nav knockout mice in terms of pain behaviour. The spectrum of human disorders caused by mutations in these channels is also outlined, concluding with a summary of recent progress in the development of selective Nav1.7 inhibitors for the treatment of pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 13 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,826,113
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#337
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,921
of 356,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#38
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.