Chapter title |
Central Sensitization in Humans: Assessment and Pharmacology
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 5 |
Book title |
Pain Control
|
Published in |
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-662-46450-2_5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-66-246449-6, 978-3-66-246450-2
|
Authors |
Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Arendt-Nielsen, Lars |
Abstract |
It is evident that chronic pain can modify the excitability of central nervous system which imposes a specific challenge for the management and for the development of new analgesics. The central manifestations can be difficult to quantify using standard clinical examination procedures, but quantitative sensory testing (QST) may help to quantify the degree and extend of the central reorganization and effect of pharmacological interventions. Furthermore, QST may help in optimizing the development programs for new drugs.Specific translational mechanistic QST tools have been developed to quantify different aspects of central sensitization in pain patients such as threshold ratios, provoked hyperalgesia/allodynia, temporal summation (wind-up like pain), after sensation, spatial summation, reflex receptive fields, descending pain modulation, offset analgesia, and referred pain areas. As most of the drug development programs in the area of pain management have not been very successful, the pharmaceutical industry has started to utilize the complementary knowledge obtained from QST profiling. Linking patients QST profile with drug efficacy profile may provide the fundamentals for developing individualized, targeted pain management programs in the future. Linking QST-assessed pain mechanisms with treatment outcome provides new valuable information in drug development and for optimizing the management regimes for chronic pain. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 176 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
Researcher | 21 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 19% |
Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Unknown | 45 | 25% |