↓ Skip to main content

Pain Control

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Central Sensitization in Humans: Assessment and Pharmacology
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Central Sensitization in Humans: Assessment and Pharmacology
Chapter number 5
Book title
Pain Control
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46450-2_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-246449-6, 978-3-66-246450-2
Authors

Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Arendt-Nielsen, Lars

Abstract

It is evident that chronic pain can modify the excitability of central nervous system which imposes a specific challenge for the management and for the development of new analgesics. The central manifestations can be difficult to quantify using standard clinical examination procedures, but quantitative sensory testing (QST) may help to quantify the degree and extend of the central reorganization and effect of pharmacological interventions. Furthermore, QST may help in optimizing the development programs for new drugs.Specific translational mechanistic QST tools have been developed to quantify different aspects of central sensitization in pain patients such as threshold ratios, provoked hyperalgesia/allodynia, temporal summation (wind-up like pain), after sensation, spatial summation, reflex receptive fields, descending pain modulation, offset analgesia, and referred pain areas. As most of the drug development programs in the area of pain management have not been very successful, the pharmaceutical industry has started to utilize the complementary knowledge obtained from QST profiling. Linking patients QST profile with drug efficacy profile may provide the fundamentals for developing individualized, targeted pain management programs in the future. Linking QST-assessed pain mechanisms with treatment outcome provides new valuable information in drug development and for optimizing the management regimes for chronic pain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 16%
Neuroscience 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 45 25%