↓ Skip to main content

Mouse Embryogenesis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mouse Embryogenesis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Mouse Genotyping
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Visualizing the Vascular Network in the Mouse Embryo and Yolk Sac
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vivo Evaluation of the Cardiovascular System of Mouse Embryo and Fetus Using High Frequency Ultrasound
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Dynamic Imaging of Mouse Embryos and Cardiodynamics in Static Culture
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 In Vivo Imaging of the Mouse Reproductive Organs, Embryo Transfer, and Oviduct Cilia Dynamics Using Optical Coherence Tomography
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Live Imaging of Fetal Intra-abdominal Organs Using Two-Photon Laser-Scanning Microscopy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Embryonary Mouse Cardiac Fibroblast Isolation
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Explant Culture for Studying Lung Development
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolating Embryonic Cardiac Progenitors and Cardiac Myocytes by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Isolation and Culture of Mouse Placental Endothelial Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Flow Cytometry and Lineage Tracing Study for Identification of Adipocyte Precursor Cell (APC) Populations
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Whole-Mount and Section In Situ Hybridization in Mouse Embryos for Detecting mRNA Expression and Localization
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Chromosome Painting of Mouse Chromosomes
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Chromatin Immunoprecipitation in Early Mouse Embryos
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Shaping Up the Embryo: The Role of Genome 3D Organization
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Genome Editing During Development Using the CRISPR-Cas Technology
Attention for Chapter 14: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation in Early Mouse Embryos
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation in Early Mouse Embryos
Chapter number 14
Book title
Mouse Embryogenesis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7714-7_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7713-0, 978-1-4939-7714-7
Authors

Estela G. García-González, Bladimir Roque-Ramirez, Carlos Palma-Flores, J. Manuel Hernández-Hernández, García-González, Estela G., Roque-Ramirez, Bladimir, Palma-Flores, Carlos, Hernández-Hernández, J. Manuel

Abstract

Epigenetic regulation is achieved at many levels by different factors such as tissue-specific transcription factors, members of the basal transcriptional apparatus, chromatin-binding proteins, and noncoding RNAs. Importantly, chromatin structure dictates the availability of a specific genomic locus for transcriptional activation as well as the efficiency with which transcription can occur. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is a method that allows elucidating gene regulation at the molecular level by assessing if chromatin modifications or proteins are present at a specific locus. Initially, the majority of ChIP experiments were performed on cultured cell lines and more recently this technique has been adapted to a variety of tissues in different model organisms. Using ChIP on mouse embryos, it is possible to document the presence or absence of specific proteins and chromatin modifications at genomic loci in vivo during mammalian development and to get biological meaning from observations made on tissue culture analyses. We describe here a ChIP protocol on freshly isolated mouse embryonic somites for in vivo analysis of muscle specific transcription factor binding on chromatin. This protocol has been easily adapted to other mouse embryonic tissues and has also been successfully scaled up to perform ChIP-Seq.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 36%
Unspecified 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,974
of 13,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,587
of 442,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.