↓ Skip to main content

Cellular and Molecular Toxicology of Nanoparticles

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Cellular and Molecular Toxicology of Nanoparticles'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Toxicity Assessment in the Nanoparticle Era
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Mechanisms of Uptake and Translocation of Nanomaterials in the Lung
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Transmucosal Nanoparticles: Toxicological Overview
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The Toxicity of Nanoparticles to Human Endothelial Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Role of Autophagy in Nanoparticles-Induced Toxicity and Its Related Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Nanoparticles-Caused Oxidative Imbalance
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Toxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Relevance of Physicochemical Characterization of Nanomaterials for Understanding Nano-cellular Interactions
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Toxicogenomics: A New Paradigm for Nanotoxicity Evaluation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles Induced Transcriptomic Alterations in HEPG2 Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Nanoparticle-Protein Interaction: The Significance and Role of Protein Corona
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Cellular and Molecular Toxicity of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Detection of DNA Damage Induced by Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticles: From Models to Molecular Mechanism Activated
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Mechanisms Underlying Neurotoxicity of Silver Nanoparticles
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Toxic and Beneficial Potential of Silver Nanoparticles: The Two Sides of the Same Coin
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Molecular and Cellular Toxicology of Nanomaterials with Related to Aquatic Organisms
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Cytotoxicity and Physiological Effects of Silver Nanoparticles on Marine Invertebrates
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Drosophila Model to Decipher the Toxicity of Nanoparticles Taken Through Oral Routes
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Using of Quantum Dots in Biology and Medicine
Attention for Chapter 19: Using of Quantum Dots in Biology and Medicine
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Using of Quantum Dots in Biology and Medicine
Chapter number 19
Book title
Cellular and Molecular Toxicology of Nanoparticles
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72041-8_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-972040-1, 978-3-31-972041-8
Authors

Svetlana Pleskova, Elza Mikheeva, Ekaterina Gornostaeva, Pleskova, Svetlana, Mikheeva, Elza, Gornostaeva, Ekaterina

Abstract

Quantum dots are nanoparticles, which due to their unique physical and chemical (first of all optical) properties, are promising in biology and medicine. There are many ways for quantum dots synthesis, both in the form of nanoislands self-forming on the surfaces, which can be used as single-photon emitters in electronics for storing information, and in the form of colloidal quantum dots for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in living systems. The paper describes the main methods of quantum dots synthesis and summarizes medical and biological ways of their use. The main emphasis is laid on the ways of quantum dots surface modification. Influence of the size and form of nanoparticles, charge on the surfaces of quantum dots, and cover type on the efficiency of internalization by cells and cell compartments is shown. The main mechanisms of penetration are considered.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 56 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 9%
Chemistry 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 59 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,225,012
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#698
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,818
of 442,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#23
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.