↓ Skip to main content

Cellular and Molecular Toxicology of Nanoparticles

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Cellular and Molecular Toxicology of Nanoparticles'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Toxicity Assessment in the Nanoparticle Era
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Mechanisms of Uptake and Translocation of Nanomaterials in the Lung
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Transmucosal Nanoparticles: Toxicological Overview
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The Toxicity of Nanoparticles to Human Endothelial Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Role of Autophagy in Nanoparticles-Induced Toxicity and Its Related Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Nanoparticles-Caused Oxidative Imbalance
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Toxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Relevance of Physicochemical Characterization of Nanomaterials for Understanding Nano-cellular Interactions
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Toxicogenomics: A New Paradigm for Nanotoxicity Evaluation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles Induced Transcriptomic Alterations in HEPG2 Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Nanoparticle-Protein Interaction: The Significance and Role of Protein Corona
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Cellular and Molecular Toxicity of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Detection of DNA Damage Induced by Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticles: From Models to Molecular Mechanism Activated
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Mechanisms Underlying Neurotoxicity of Silver Nanoparticles
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Toxic and Beneficial Potential of Silver Nanoparticles: The Two Sides of the Same Coin
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Molecular and Cellular Toxicology of Nanomaterials with Related to Aquatic Organisms
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Cytotoxicity and Physiological Effects of Silver Nanoparticles on Marine Invertebrates
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Drosophila Model to Decipher the Toxicity of Nanoparticles Taken Through Oral Routes
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Using of Quantum Dots in Biology and Medicine
Attention for Chapter 15: Toxic and Beneficial Potential of Silver Nanoparticles: The Two Sides of the Same Coin
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Toxic and Beneficial Potential of Silver Nanoparticles: The Two Sides of the Same Coin
Chapter number 15
Book title
Cellular and Molecular Toxicology of Nanoparticles
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72041-8_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-972040-1, 978-3-31-972041-8
Authors

Lilian Rodrigues Rosa Souza, Veronica Santana da Silva, Leonardo Pereira Franchi, Tiago Alves Jorge de Souza

Abstract

Nanotechnology has allowed great changes in chemical, biological and physical properties of metals when compared to their bulk counterparts. Within this context, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) play a major role due to their unique properties, being widely used in daily products such as fabrics, washing machines, water filters, food and medicine. However, AgNPs can enter cells inducing a "Trojan-horse" type mechanism which potentially leads to cellular autophagy, apoptosis or necrosis. On the other hand, this cytotoxicity mechanism can be optimized to develop drug nanocarriers and anticancer therapies. The increasing use of these NPs entails their release into the environment, damaging ecosystems balance and representing a threat to human health. In this context, the possible deleterious effects that these NPs may represent for the biotic and abiotic ecosystems components represent an obstacle that must be overcome in order to guarantee the safety use of their unique properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,967,526
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,274
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,768
of 442,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#92
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.