You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
High-Throughput and High-Content Micronucleus Assay in CHO-K1 Cells
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 9 |
| Book title |
High-Throughput Screening Assays in Toxicology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6346-1_9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6344-7, 978-1-4939-6346-1
|
| Authors |
Sampada A. Shahane, Kana Nishihara, Menghang Xia, Shahane, Sampada A., Nishihara, Kana, Xia, Menghang |
| Abstract |
Visualization of micronuclei induction by chemicals and drugs enables measurement of possible compound genotoxicity. A loss of entire chromosome or a fragment of chromosome can lead to formation of micronuclei (MNi). The in vitro micronucleus assay can be conducted using nuclear dyes with high-content imaging platforms. This chapter describes the cytochalasin block method of measuring micronuclei in CHO-K1 cell lines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,069,986
of 24,585,148 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,120
of 13,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,657
of 403,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#240
of 1,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,148 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.