You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Throughput Screening Assays in Toxicology
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6346-1 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6344-7, 978-1-4939-6346-1
|
| Editors |
Hao Zhu, Menghang Xia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 25% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,868,668
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#516
of 14,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,405
of 401,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#70
of 1,466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.