You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Bacteriophage Treatment of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 13 |
Book title |
Bacteriophage Therapy
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7394-1, 978-1-4939-7395-8
|
Authors |
Vera V. Morozova, Yulia N. Kozlova, Denis A. Ganichev, Nina V. Tikunova, Morozova, Vera V., Kozlova, Yulia N., Ganichev, Denis A., Tikunova, Nina V. |
Abstract |
Diabetic foot ulcers occur as a common complication of diabetes. Healing of the ulcers is largely delayed by the concomitant infection. Antibiotic treatment of infected ulcers is complicated by formation of microbial biofilms , which are often heterogeneous and resistant to antibiotics. Bacteriophage therapy is considered as an additional approach to the treatment of infected wounds. Here, we describe the basic method of application of bacteriophages for treatment of infected diabetic foot ulcers, including ones that are very large. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 31 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,970,448
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#300
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,792
of 331,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.