You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Isolation of Bacteriophages for Fastidious Bacteria
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 1 |
Book title |
Bacteriophage Therapy
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7394-1, 978-1-4939-7395-8
|
Authors |
Shigenobu Matsuzaki, Jumpei Uchiyama, Iyo Takemura-Uchiyama, Takako Ujihara, Masanori Daibata |
Abstract |
One of the most important factors for successful bacteriophage therapy is, undoubtedly, the isolation of excellent therapeutic candidate bacteriophages. There are only a few reports about active bacteriophages in the fastidious bacteria Helicobacter pylori. In this chapter, we describe a method for isolating and purifying KHP30-like bacteriophages in H. pylori, which have lytic and pseudolysogenic life cycles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,357,504
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,687
of 13,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,415
of 335,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.