You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Interaction of Bacteriophages with Mammalian Cells
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
Bacteriophage Therapy
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7394-1, 978-1-4939-7395-8
|
| Authors |
Zuzanna Kaźmierczak, Krystyna Dąbrowska |
| Abstract |
Natural bacteriophages (present in the microbiome) and those applied as therapeutic agents may interact with mammalian cells and tissues. Adhesion interactions may define bacteriophage pharmacokinetics and resulting efficiency of bacteriophage agents in therapeutic applications by shaping bacteriophage homing to tissues and organs. Here we propose protocols for testing direct adhesion of bacteriophages or bacteriophage proteins to mammalian cells (in vitro). We further propose an animal model for investigation of accumulation/homing of bacteriophages in tissues (in vivo). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 29% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,962,770
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,015
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,567
of 331,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.