You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Compassionate Use of Bacteriophage Therapy for Foot Ulcer Treatment as an Effective Step for Moving Toward Clinical Trials
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 14 |
Book title |
Bacteriophage Therapy
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7394-1, 978-1-4939-7395-8
|
Authors |
Randolph Fish, Elizabeth Kutter, Gordon Wheat, Bob Blasdel, Mzia Kutateladze, Sarah Kuhl, Fish, Randolph, Kutter, Elizabeth, Wheat, Gordon, Blasdel, Bob, Kutateladze, Mzia, Kuhl, Sarah |
Abstract |
We here present detailed descriptions of successful treatment of a series of diabetic toe ulcers using the Eliava BioPreparations' commercial preparation of the very well-studied anti-staphylococcal bacteriophage Sb-1. This chapter outlines what we feel is an appropriate mechanism to speed movement toward full-scale clinical trials with bacteriophage use to treat wound infections and to help address the crisis in antibiotic resistance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
France | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Researcher | 17 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 48 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 16% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 53 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,589,683
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,006
of 13,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,113
of 332,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#9
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.