You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
In Vitro Activity of Bacteriophages Against Planktonic and Biofilm Populations Assessed by Flow Cytometry
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Bacteriophage Therapy
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7394-1, 978-1-4939-7395-8
|
| Authors |
Diana P. Pires, Luís D. R. Melo |
| Abstract |
The in vitro activity of bacteriophages against planktonic cultures and biofilms is commonly evaluated by culture methods. However, these methods can lead to an underestimation of total bacterial cells when they undergo different physiological states.This chapter describes the methodology used to assess the in vitro activity of bacteriophages against planktonic cultures of bacteria in different metabolic states and biofilm populations by flow cytometry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Chile | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,919,786
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,286
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,020
of 331,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#28
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.