↓ Skip to main content

Hypertension: from basic research to clinical practice

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Hypertension: from basic research to clinical practice'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Endocrine Hypertension: A Practical Approach
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Hypertension: From Basic Research to Clinical Practice
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 36 The Role of Beta-Blockers in the Treatment of Hypertension
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 37 Emotional Stress as a Risk for Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africans: Are We Ignoring the Odds?
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 38 Resistant Hypertension
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 48 Cerebellar Adrenomedullinergic System. Role in Cardiovascular Regulation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 49 Principles of Blood Pressure Measurement – Current Techniques, Office vs Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 75 Recent Advances in the Genetics of Hypertension
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 76 Phaeochromocytoma and Paraganglioma
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 77 Adherence to Treatment in Hypertension
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 78 Measurement of Arterial Stiffness: A Novel Tool of Risk Stratification in Hypertension
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 79 Metabolomics, Lipidomics and Pharmacometabolomics of Human Hypertension
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 80 The Role of DNA Methylation in Hypertension
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 81 Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 82 Superimposed Preeclampsia
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 83 Understanding Blood Pressure Variation and Variability: Biological Importance and Clinical Significance
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 84 Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 85 Subclinical Kidney Damage in Hypertensive Patients: A Renal Window Opened on the Cardiovascular System. Focus on Microalbuminuria
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 86 The Relationship Between Aortic Root Size and Hypertension: An Unsolved Conundrum
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 87 Unique Considerations When Managing Hypertension in the Transplant Patient
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 88 Hypertension in the Hemodialysis Patient
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 89 Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 90 Endothelial Dysfunction and Hypertension
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 96 Novel Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Hypertension
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 97 Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 98 Treating Hypertension to Prevent Cognitive Decline and Dementia: Re-Opening the Debate
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 99 Hypertension Is a Risk Factor for Several Types of Heart Disease: Review of Prospective Studies
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 147 Impact of Salt Intake on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hypertension.
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 148 Renal Denervation
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 149 Challenges in the Management of Hypertension in Older Populations
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 150 Hypertension in Pregnancy
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 151 Blood Pressure Self-Measurement
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 168 Evidence-Based Revised View of the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 169 Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Correlates of Therapeutic Pharmacological Interventions in Essential Arterial Hypertension
  36. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 170 Renal Ultrasound (and Doppler Sonography) in Hypertension: An Update
  37. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 172 Primordial Prevention of Cardiometabolic Risk in Childhood.
  38. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 177 Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension
Attention for Chapter 97: Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?
Chapter number 97
Book title
Hypertension: from basic research to clinical practice
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_97
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-944250-1, 978-3-31-944251-8
Authors

Faiçal Jarraya, Jarraya, Faiçal

Abstract

Hypertension remains the most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. If antihypertensive drugs choice is well guided today, blood pressure (BP) target still a subject of controversies. Residual risk is matter of debate and the lower- the better dogma is come back again regarding to data reported from recent trials. The J curve, reason for European Society of Hypertension Guidelines reappraisal in 2009, is criticized by recent data. The one goal (<140/90 mmHg) fit 90 mmg 90 mmHg) fit all should be adapted as a personalized goal guided by evidence generated by randomized controlled trials. Target controversy is back because of the results of ACCORD and SPRINT trials challenging the common systolic BP target less 140 mmHg to less than 120 mmHg. The first was performed in diabetic patients and the second in patients at high cardiovascular risk; elderly aged of 75 years and above, or patients with chronic kidney disease, or with pre-existing subclinical or clinical cardiovascular disease or a Framingham 10-year cardiovascular disease risk score of 15 % or above, however non diabetic. If the first trial was negative, SPRINT reports a huge reduction of the composite primary outcome, which included myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes by 25 %, and the risk of death from all causes by 27 %, when target systolic BP is lower than 120 mmHg compared to lower than 140 mmHg. However, BP was measured by automated office BP technique which correlates more with home BP measurement than auscultatory office BP measurement. Also, only significant less heart failure in the intensive arm was driving the difference in mortality favoring the intensive arm in SPRINT. The greater use of diuretics may have demasked latent heart failure in hypertensive patients with rather high cardiovascular risk.More convincing data suggest that BP should be diagnosed early and treatment should be started at BP level of 140 mmHg and above, based on an office BP measurement, confirmed by an out-of-office BP measurement. Target systolic BP should be less than 140 mmHg if BP is measured by classic auscultatory method, less than 120 mmHg in high risk patients if BP is measured by automated office BP measurement. These targets are relevant in elderly patients if no orthostatic hypotension occurred, patients with non proteinuric chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 60 ml/mn/1.73 m(2)) and patients with cardiovascular disease or a Framingham score more than 15 %. However attention should be taken on diastolic BP if lower than 70 mmHg because of an increasing risk of ischemic heart event and on renal function since acute renal failure is more frequently reported at these low targets.In diabetic patients, SBP target should be less than 140 mmHg according to ACCORD trial. However, for patients with protein-creatinine ratio >500 mg/g (albumin-creatinine ratio > 300 mg/g), with or without diabetes, lower SBP target should be proposed for renal protection aiming SBP < 130 mmHg as recommended by KDIGO guidelines.In patients at low or intermediate risk, without cardiovascular disease, SBP should start to be treated when SBP is above 140 mmHg, and when treated, target BP should be less than 140 mmHg as reported by HOPE-3 trial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,387
of 5,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,404
of 401,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#137
of 444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.