↓ Skip to main content

Photorespiration

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Photorespiration'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Estimation of Photorespiratory Fluxes by Gas Exchange
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Measurement of Transcripts Associated with Photorespiration and Related Redox Signaling
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Measurement of Enzyme Activities
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 In Vitro Alkylation Methods for Assessing the Protein Redox State
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Dimethyl-Labeling-Based Quantification of the Lysine Acetylome and Proteome of Plants
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 In Vitro Analysis of Metabolite Transport Proteins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Quantification of Photorespiratory Intermediates by Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Targeted Isolation and Characterization of T-DNA Mutants Defective in Photorespiration
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Exploiting Natural Variation to Discover Candidate Genes Involved in Photosynthesis-Related Traits
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Metabolic Engineering of Photorespiration
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 13CO2 Labeling and Mass Spectral Analysis of Photorespiration
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Isotopically Nonstationary Metabolic Flux Analysis (INST-MFA) of Photosynthesis and Photorespiration in Plants
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Genome-Scale Modeling of Photorespiratory Pathway Manipulation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Kinetic Modeling of Photorespiration
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Investigating the Role of the Photorespiratory Pathway in Non-photosynthetic Tissues
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Studying the Function of the Phosphorylated Pathway of Serine Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Light Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, and Immunohistochemistry Protocols for Studying Photorespiration
Attention for Chapter 17: Light Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, and Immunohistochemistry Protocols for Studying Photorespiration
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Light Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, and Immunohistochemistry Protocols for Studying Photorespiration
Chapter number 17
Book title
Photorespiration
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7225-8_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7224-1, 978-1-4939-7225-8
Authors

Roxana Khoshravesh, Vanessa Lundsgaard-Nielsen, Stefanie Sultmanis, Tammy L. Sage, Khoshravesh, Roxana, Lundsgaard-Nielsen, Vanessa, Sultmanis, Stefanie, Sage, Tammy L.

Abstract

High-resolution images obtained from plant tissues processed for light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry have provided crucial links between plant subcellular structure and physiology during photorespiration as well as the impact of photorespiration on plant evolution and development. This chapter presents established protocols to guide researchers in the preparation of plant tissues for high-resolution imaging with a light and transmission electron microscope and detection of proteins using immunohistochemistry. Discussion of concepts and theory behind each step in the process from tissue preservation to staining of resin-embedded tissues is included to enhance the understanding of all steps in the procedure. We also include a brief protocol for quantification of cellular parameters from high-resolution images to help researchers rigorously test hypotheses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Computer Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Energy 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,802,551
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,636
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,111
of 421,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#187
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.