↓ Skip to main content

Organelle Contact Sites

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Organelle Contact Sites'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Organelle Communication at Membrane Contact Sites (MCS): From Curiosity to Center Stage in Cell Biology and Biomedical Research
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Over Six Decades of Discovery and Characterization of the Architecture at Mitochondria-Associated Membranes (MAMs)
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Regulation of Mitochondrial Dynamics and Autophagy by the Mitochondria-Associated Membrane
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondria Communication Through Ca2+ Signaling: The Importance of Mitochondria-Associated Membranes (MAMs)
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Ceramide Transport from the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Trans Golgi Region at Organelle Membrane Contact Sites
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Endoplasmic Reticulum – Plasma Membrane Crosstalk Mediated by the Extended Synaptotagmins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Endoplasmic Reticulum-Plasma Membrane Contacts Regulate Cellular Excitability
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Lipid Droplet and the Endoplasmic Reticulum
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Role of Intra- and Inter-mitochondrial Membrane Contact Sites in Yeast Phospholipid Biogenesis
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Discovery and Roles of ER-Endolysosomal Contact Sites in Disease
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Alzheimer Disease
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Mitochondrial-Associated Membranes in Parkinson’s Disease
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondria Communication in Type 2 Diabetes
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Mitochondria–Endoplasmic Reticulum Contact Sites Mediate Innate Immune Responses
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Hepatitis C Virus Replication
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Hijacking of Membrane Contact Sites by Intracellular Bacterial Pathogens
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Alterations in Ca2+ Signalling via ER-Mitochondria Contact Site Remodelling in Cancer
Attention for Chapter 13: Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondria Communication in Type 2 Diabetes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondria Communication in Type 2 Diabetes
Chapter number 13
Book title
Organelle Contact Sites
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4567-7_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-104566-0, 978-9-81-104567-7
Authors

Jennifer Rieusset, Rieusset, Jennifer

Abstract

Although mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and disrupted lipid and calcium (Ca(2+)) homeostasis are classically associated with both insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the interplay between these metabolic stresses is less known. Both organelles interact through contact points known as mitochondria-associated membranes (MAM), in order to exchange both lipids and Ca(2+) and regulate cellular homeostasis. Recent evidences suggest that MAM could be an important hub for hormonal and nutrient signaling in the liver and that ER-mitochondria miscommunication could participate to hepatic insulin resistance, highlighting the importance of MAM in the control of glucose homeostasis. Here, we specifically discuss the role of MAM in hormonal and nutrient-regulated signaling pathways supporting a role in the control of glucose homeostasis and analyze the evidences pointing a role of ER-mitochondria miscommunication in T2DM. Collectively, these data suggest that targeting MAM structure and function might be a novel strategy for the treatment of T2DM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,475,586
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,515
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,292
of 421,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#235
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.