↓ Skip to main content

Long Non Coding RNA Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Technological Developments in lncRNA Biology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Technological Developments in lncRNA Biology
Chapter number 10
Book title
Long Non Coding RNA Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5203-3_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-105202-6, 978-9-81-105203-3
Authors

Sonali Jathar, Vikram Kumar, Juhi Srivastava, Vidisha Tripathi, Jathar, Sonali, Kumar, Vikram, Srivastava, Juhi, Tripathi, Vidisha

Abstract

It is estimated that more than 90% of the mammalian genome is transcribed as non-coding RNAs. Recent evidences have established that these non-coding transcripts are not junk or just transcriptional noise, but they do serve important biological purpose. One of the rapidly expanding fields of this class of transcripts is the regulatory lncRNAs, which had been a major challenge in terms of their molecular functions and mechanisms of action. The emergence of high-throughput technologies and the development in various conventional approaches have led to the expansion of the lncRNA world. The combination of multidisciplinary approaches has proven to be essential to unravel the complexity of their regulatory networks and helped establish the importance of their existence. Here, we review the current methodologies available for discovering and investigating functions of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and focus on the powerful technological advancement available to specifically address their functional importance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 31 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 30 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,115,649
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#673
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,150
of 421,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#60
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.