↓ Skip to main content

Long Non Coding RNA Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Long Noncoding RNAs in Plants
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Long Noncoding RNAs in Plants
Chapter number 5
Book title
Long Non Coding RNA Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5203-3_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-105202-6, 978-9-81-105203-3
Authors

Hsiao-Lin V. Wang, Julia A. Chekanova, Wang, Hsiao-Lin V., Chekanova, Julia A.

Abstract

The eukaryotic genomes are pervasively transcribed. In addition to protein-coding RNAs, thousands of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) modulate key molecular and biological processes. Most lncRNAs are found in the nucleus and associate with chromatin, but lncRNAs can function in both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. Emerging work has found that many lncRNAs regulate gene expression and can affect genome stability and nuclear domain organization both in plant and in the animal kingdom. Here, we describe the major plant lncRNAs and how they act, with a focus on research in Arabidopsis thaliana and our emerging understanding of lncRNA functions in serving as molecular sponges and decoys, functioning in regulation of transcription and silencing, particularly in RNA-directed DNA methylation, and in epigenetic regulation of flowering time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 44 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 26%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Unspecified 2 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 42 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,139,543
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#301
of 5,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,155
of 423,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#30
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.