↓ Skip to main content

Fast Detection of DNA Damage

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Fast Detection of DNA Damage'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Express FRET Labeling and Analysis of Phagocytic Clearance
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Rapid Assessment of Genotoxicity by Flow Cytometric Detection of Cell Cycle Alterations
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Ultrasound Imaging of DNA-Damage Effects in Live Cultured Cells and in Brain Tissue
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Ultrasound Imaging of Apoptosis: Spectroscopic Detection of DNA-Damage Effects In Vivo
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Fluorochrome-Labeled Inhibitors of Caspases: Expedient In Vitro and In Vivo Markers of Apoptotic Cells for Rapid Cytometric Analysis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Fast-Halo Assay for the Detection of DNA Damage
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Rapid Detection of Bacterial Susceptibility or Resistance to Quinolones
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Rapid Detection of Apoptosis in Cultured Mammalian Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Quick Detection of DNase II-Type Breaks in Formalin-Fixed Tissue Sections
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Express γ-H2AX Immunocytochemical Detection of DNA Damage
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Rapid Detection of γ-H2AX by Flow Cytometry in Cultured Mammalian Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Rapid Detection of DNA Strand Breaks in Apoptotic Cells by Flow- and Image-Cytometry
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Fast Micromethod: Determination of DNA Integrity in Cell Suspensions and in Solid Tissues
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Quantification of DNA Damage and Repair in Mitochondrial, Nuclear, and Bacterial Genomes by Real-Time PCR
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Zebra Tail Amplification: Accelerated Detection of Apoptotic Blunt-Ended DNA Breaks by In Situ Ligation
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Twelve-Gel Comet Assay Format for Quick Examination of DNA Damage and Repair
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Immunofluorescence Analysis of γ-H2AX Foci in Mammalian Fibroblasts at Different Phases of the Cell Cycle
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 RAPD-PCR as a Rapid Approach for the Evaluation of Genotoxin-Induced Damage to Bacterial DNA
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Rapid Detection of γ-H2Av Foci in Ex Vivo MMS-Treated Drosophila Imaginal Discs
Attention for Chapter 19: Rapid Detection of γ-H2Av Foci in Ex Vivo MMS-Treated Drosophila Imaginal Discs
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Rapid Detection of γ-H2Av Foci in Ex Vivo MMS-Treated Drosophila Imaginal Discs
Chapter number 19
Book title
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7187-9_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7185-5, 978-1-4939-7187-9
Authors

Khodaverdian, Varandt Y., McVey, Mitch, Varandt Y. Khodaverdian, Mitch McVey

Abstract

In Drosophila melanogaster, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) created by exposure to gamma or X-ray radiation can be quantified by immunofluorescent detection of phosphorylated histone H2Av (γ-H2Av) foci in imaginal disc tissues. This technique has been less useful for studying DSBs in imaginal discs exposed to DSB-inducing chemicals, since standard protocols require raising larvae in food treated with liquid chemical suspensions. These protocols typically take 3-4 days to complete and result in heterogeneous responses that do not provide information about the kinetics of DSB formation and repair. Here, we describe a novel and rapid method to quantify DSBs in imaginal discs cultured ex vivo with methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or other DSB-inducing chemicals. The described method requires less than 24 h and provides precise control over MMS concentration and exposure time, enabling reproducible detection of transient DSBs. Furthermore, this technique can be used for nearly any chemical treatment and can be modified and adapted for several different experimental setups and downstream molecular analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,434,884
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,931
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,116
of 312,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#212
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.