↓ Skip to main content

Promoter Associated RNA

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Promoter Associated RNA'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 ChIP-seq for the Identification of Functional Elements in the Human Genome
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Identification of Candidate Functional Elements in the Genome from ChIP-seq Data
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 GRO-seq, A Tool for Identification of Transcripts Regulating Gene Expression
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding 5′-Capped Transcriptomes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Deep Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE): Genome-Wide Identification of Promoters, Quantification of Their Activity, and Transcriptional Network Inference
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Deep-RACE: Comprehensive Search for Novel ncRNAs Associated to a Specific Locus
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 In Silico Prediction of RNA Secondary Structure
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Computational Prediction of RNA-Protein Interactions
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolation of Nuclear RNA-Associated Protein Complexes
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Identification of Long Noncoding RNAs Associated to Human Disease Susceptibility
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Targeting Promoter-Associated RNAs by siRNAs
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 RNA-FISH to Study Regulatory RNA at the Site of Transcription
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Detection and Characterization of R Loop Structures
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Induction of Transcriptional Gene Silencing by Expression of shRNA Directed to c-Myc P2 Promoter in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Tissue-Specific Virosomal Delivery
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Targeting Promoter-Associated Noncoding RNA In Vivo
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Manipulation of Promoter-Associated Noncoding RNAs in Mouse Early Embryos for Controlling Sequence-Specific Epigenetic Status
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Erratum to: NanoCAGE: A Method for the Analysis of Coding and Noncoding 5′-Capped Transcriptomes
Attention for Chapter 5: Deep Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE): Genome-Wide Identification of Promoters, Quantification of Their Activity, and Transcriptional Network Inference
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Deep Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE): Genome-Wide Identification of Promoters, Quantification of Their Activity, and Transcriptional Network Inference
Chapter number 5
Book title
Promoter Associated RNA
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6716-2_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6714-8, 978-1-4939-6716-2
Authors

Fort, Alexandre, Fish, Richard J., Alexandre Fort, Richard J. Fish

Editors

Sara Napoli

Abstract

Among the most significant findings of the post-genomic era, the discovery of pervasive transcription of mammalian genomes has tremendously modified our understanding of the genome output seen as RNA molecules. The increased focus on non-protein-coding genomic regions together with concomitant technological innovations has led to rapid discovery of numerous noncoding transcripts (ncRNAs). Biological relevance and functional roles of the vast majority of these ncRNAs remain largely unknown.The cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) technology allows accurate transcript detection and quantification without relying on preexisting transcript models. In combination with complementary data sets, generated using other technologies, it has been shown as an efficient approach for exploring transcriptome complexity.Here, we describe the use of CAGE for the identification of novel noncoding transcripts in mammalian cells providing detailed information for basic data processing and advanced bioinformatics analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Computer Science 3 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#12,838,216
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,227
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,488
of 308,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#52
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.