Chapter title |
Mapping Biological Networks from Quantitative Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry: Data to Knowledge Pipelines
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 19 |
Book title |
Protein Bioinformatics
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6783-4_19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6781-0, 978-1-4939-6783-4
|
Authors |
Erin L. Crowgey, Andrea Matlock, Vidya Venkatraman, Justyna Fert-Bober, Jennifer E. Van Eyk |
Editors |
Cathy H. Wu, Cecilia N. Arighi, Karen E. Ross |
Abstract |
Data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) strategies and applications provide unique advantages for qualitative and quantitative proteome probing of a biological sample allowing constant sensitivity and reproducibility across large sample sets. These advantages in LC-MS/MS are being realized in fundamental research laboratories and for clinical research applications. However, the ability to translate high-throughput raw LC-MS/MS proteomic data into biological knowledge is a complex and difficult task requiring the use of many algorithms and tools for which there is no widely accepted standard and best practices are slowly being implemented. Today a single tool or approach inherently fails to capture the full interpretation that proteomics uniquely supplies, including the dynamics of quickly reversible chemically modified states of proteins, irreversible amino acid modifications, signaling truncation events, and, finally, determining the presence of protein from allele-specific transcripts. This chapter highlights key steps and publicly available algorithms required to translate DIA-MS data into knowledge. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
Researcher | 3 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
Computer Science | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |