You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Characterizing Satellite Cells and Myogenic Progenitors During Skeletal Muscle Regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Histochemistry of Single Molecules
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6788-9_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6787-2, 978-1-4939-6788-9
|
| Authors |
Nicolas A. Dumont, Michael A. Rudnicki, Dumont, Nicolas A., Rudnicki, Michael A. |
| Editors |
Carlo Pellicciari, Marco Biggiogera |
| Abstract |
Muscle stem cells, named satellite cells, are quiescent in resting skeletal muscle. Following injury, satellite cells are activated and become proliferating myoblasts that either self-renew or differentiate. Several markers are used to identify the different myogenic populations, such as Pax7 (quiescent and activated satellite cells), MyoD (proliferating myoblasts), and myogenin (differentiating myoblasts). Immunodetection of these markers is a very useful tool to analyze myogenic cells and muscle regeneration. Here, we describe a method for immunodetection of satellite cells and their myogenic progeny in resting and regenerating skeletal muscles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 13% |
| China | 1 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 24% |
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,722,136
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,598
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,202
of 420,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#182
of 1,176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.