You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Light Microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6810-7 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6808-4, 978-1-4939-6810-7
|
| Editors |
Yolanda Markaki, Hartmann Harz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 25% |
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 32% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,502,008
of 24,647,023 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#427
of 13,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,103
of 430,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#64
of 1,078 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,647,023 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,078 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.