↓ Skip to main content

Plant Synthetic Promoters

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Synthetic Promoters'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Plant Synthetic Promoters
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Quantitative Analysis of Cis-Regulatory Element Activity Using Synthetic Promoters in Transgenic Plants
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Identification of Cis-Regulatory Sequence Motifs in Gene Promoters Based on SNP Information
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Plant Synthetic Promoters
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Analyzing Synthetic Promoters Using Arabidopsis Protoplasts
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Selecting Hypomethylated Genomic Regions Using MRE-Seq
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Spatio-Temporal Imaging of Promoter Activity in Intact Plant Tissues
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Novel Synthetic Promoters from the Cestrum Yellow Leaf Curling Virus
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Fast and Efficient Cloning of Cis-Regulatory Sequences for High-Throughput Yeast One-Hybrid Analyses of Transcription Factors
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 The Physcomitrella patens System for Transient Gene Expression Assays
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Analysis of Microbe-Associated Molecular Pattern-Responsive Synthetic Promoters with the Parsley Protoplast System
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Framework for Discovering, Designing, and Testing MicroProteins to Regulate Synthetic Transcriptional Modules
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Simultaneous Analysis of Multiple Promoters: An Application of the PC-GW Binary Vector Series
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Plant Synthetic Promoters
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Bioinformatic Identification of Conserved Cis-Sequences in Coregulated Genes
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Silico Expression Analysis
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 FootprintDB: Analysis of Plant Cis-Regulatory Elements, Transcription Factors, and Binding Interfaces
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 RSAT::Plants: Motif Discovery Within Clusters of Upstream Sequences in Plant Genomes
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Plant Synthetic Promoters
Attention for Chapter 14: Plant Synthetic Promoters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Plant Synthetic Promoters
Chapter number 14
Book title
Plant Synthetic Promoters
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6396-6_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6394-2, 978-1-4939-6396-6
Authors

Coll, Anna, Wilson, Mandy L, Gruden, Kristina, Peccoud, Jean, Anna Coll, Mandy L. Wilson, Kristina Gruden, Jean Peccoud

Editors

Reinhard Hehl

Abstract

With the rapid advances in prediction tools for discovery of new promoters and their cis-elements, there is a need to improve plant expression methodologies in order to facilitate a high-throughput functional validation of these promoters in planta. The promoter-reporter analysis is an indispensible approach for characterization of plant promoters. It requires the design of complex plant expression vectors, which can be challenging. Here, we describe the use of a plant grammar implemented in GenoCAD that will allow the users to quickly design constructs for promoter analysis experiments but also for other in planta functional studies. The GenoCAD plant grammar includes a library of plant biological parts organized in structural categories to facilitate their use and management and a set of rules that guides the process of assembling these biological parts into large constructs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Chemical Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,812,737
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,243
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,795
of 393,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#752
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.