↓ Skip to main content

Cancer and Zebrafish

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Cancer and Zebrafish'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Uncharted Waters: Zebrafish Cancer Models Navigate a Course for Oncogene Discovery
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Toolbox for Conditional Zebrafish Cancer Models
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Cancer and Zebrafish
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Tumor Suppressors in Zebrafish: From TP53 to PTEN and Beyond
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Identifying Novel Cancer Therapies Using Chemical Genetics and Zebrafish
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Cancer and Zebrafish
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Cancer and Zebrafish
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Cancer and Zebrafish
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Lymphatics, Cancer and Zebrafish
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Vivo Imaging of Cancer in Zebrafish
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Imaging Cancer Angiogenesis and Metastasis in a Zebrafish Embryo Model
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Allograft Cancer Cell Transplantation in Zebrafish
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 The Zebrafish Xenograft Platform: Evolution of a Novel Cancer Model and Preclinical Screening Tool
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Automation of Technology for Cancer Research
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Cancer and Zebrafish
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Zebrafish Rhabdomyosarcoma
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Baiting for Cancer: Using the Zebrafish as a Model in Liver and Pancreatic Cancer
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Focusing the Spotlight on the Zebrafish Intestine to Illuminate Mechanisms of Colorectal Cancer
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Zebrafish Melanoma
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Cancer and Zebrafish
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Zebrafish Germ Cell Tumors
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Xiphophorus and Medaka Cancer Models
Attention for Chapter 3: Cancer and Zebrafish
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cancer and Zebrafish
Chapter number 3
Book title
Cancer and Zebrafish
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30654-4_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-930652-0, 978-3-31-930654-4
Authors

Parant, John M, Yeh, Jing-Ruey Joanna, John M. Parant, Jing-Ruey Joanna Yeh, Parant, John M.

Editors

David M. Langenau

Abstract

Animal models of tumor initiation and tumor progression are essential components toward understanding cancer and designing/validating future therapies. Zebrafish is a powerful model for studying tumorigenesis and has been successfully exploited in drug discovery. According to the zebrafish reference genome, 82 % of disease-associated genes in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database have clear zebrafish orthologues. Using a variety of large-scale random mutagenesis methods developed to date, zebrafish can provide a unique opportunity to identify gene mutations that may be associated with cancer predisposition. On the other hand, newer technologies enabling targeted mutagenesis can facilitate reverse cancer genetic studies and open the door for complex genetic analysis of tumorigenesis. In this chapter, we will describe the various technologies for conducting genome editing in zebrafish with special emphasis on the approaches to inactivate genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,749,545
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,935
of 4,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,104
of 310,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#33
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.