You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Neuropharmacology of Synthetic Cathinones
New Psychoactive Substances
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2018
Michael H. Baumann, Hailey M. Walters, Marco Niello, Harald H. Sitte, Baumann, Michael H., Walters, Hailey M., Niello, Marco, Sitte, Harald H.
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||14||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||13||14%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||11||12%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||17||18%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||10||11%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 453,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.